Wine-Banks on Daniels’ Testimony in Trump’s N.Y. Trial: The Defense ‘Fell Flat’

RUSH TRANSCRIPT MOHYELDIN Jell ░░░░░░░░ s lawyers asked for ░░░░░░░░ mistrial twice after Daniels ░░░░░░░░ this week claiming that ░░░░░░░░ was changing her story ░░░░░░░░ was testifying about matters ░░░░░░░░ were irrelevant to the ░░░░░░░░ How common is it ░░░░░░░░ a Judge to rule ░░░░░░░░ favor of a mistrial ░░░░░░░░ a witness testimony And ░░░░░░░░ does this say about ░░░░░░░░ impact of Daniels testimony ░░░░░░░░ Trump and his team ░░░░░░░░ BANKS Obviously it shows ░░░░░░░░ they were worried about ░░░░░░░░ impact on the jury ░░░░░░░░ I agree with David ░░░░░░░░ it s hard to ░░░░░░░░ whether the jury bought ░░░░░░░░ this or not I ░░░░░░░░ that it has been ░░░░░░░░ weak defense I just ░░░░░░░░ to comment on one ░░░░░░░░ because there has been ░░░░░░░░ about the fact that ░░░░░░░░ was a woman attorney ░░░░░░░░ a woman who was ░░░░░░░░ key witness and going ░░░░░░░░ to Watergate everybody said ░░░░░░░░ you are questioning Rosemary ░░░░░░░░ because you are a ░░░░░░░░ and that isn t ░░░░░░░░ all what happened Sometimes ░░░░░░░░ gender of the questioner ░░░░░░░░ make a difference and ░░░░░░░░ is relevant In this ░░░░░░░░ I don t think ░░░░░░░░ was any difference in ░░░░░░░░ type of questions that ░░░░░░░░ was asking than if ░░░░░░░░ of her male colleagues ░░░░░░░░ been doing the asking ░░░░░░░░ really fell flat and ░░░░░░░░ didn t work and ░░░░░░░░ would not have worked ░░░░░░░░ matter who was asking ░░░░░░░░ questions.”