Judge Nap: ‘Absurd’ Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton Would Go to that Length to Talk About Grandkids

RUSH TRANSCRIPT SHAWN We ░░░░░░░░ a Fox News alert ░░░░░░░░ those newly uncovered documents ░░░░░░░░ the F B I ░░░░░░░░ watchdog group Judicial Watch ░░░░░░░░ they re related to ░░░░░░░░ controversial Phoenix airport tarmac ░░░░░░░░ between former president Bill ░░░░░░░░ and then Obama attorney ░░░░░░░░ Loretta Lynch You may ░░░░░░░░ that meeting happening last ░░░░░░░░ and it happened just ░░░░░░░░ a decision came down ░░░░░░░░ or not there would ░░░░░░░░ any indictments in the ░░░░░░░░ Clinton e mail case ░░░░░░░░ Watch all 30 pages ░░░░░░░░ be sent to them ░░░░░░░░ the end of November ░░░░░░░░ response to their Freedom ░░░░░░░░ Information Act lawsuit Guess ░░░░░░░░ They say the F ░░░░░░░░ I first told them ░░░░░░░░ didn t have them ░░░░░░░░ Andrew Napolitano senior Fox ░░░░░░░░ judicial analyst is with ░░░░░░░░ Judge what is it ░░░░░░░░ the F B I ░░░░░░░░ many times in cases ░░░░░░░░ we cover they don ░░░░░░░░ know if they have ░░░░░░░░ Lawyers try to get ░░░░░░░░ They say We don ░░░░░░░░ have anything and voila ░░░░░░░░ they get something NAPOLITANO ░░░░░░░░ is not just the ░░░░░░░░ B I It is ░░░░░░░░ all of the federal ░░░░░░░░ And the Trump State ░░░░░░░░ has done the same ░░░░░░░░ with Freedom of Information ░░░░░░░░ requests There is an ░░░░░░░░ instinctual response We don ░░░░░░░░ have it we don ░░░░░░░░ have it We can ░░░░░░░░ find it And then ░░░░░░░░ person making the FOIA ░░░░░░░░ files a lawsuit and ░░░░░░░░ federal judge says Look ░░░░░░░░ it and they find ░░░░░░░░ In this case we ░░░░░░░░ t know what was ░░░░░░░░ We only know that ░░░░░░░░ FBI through lawyers in ░░░░░░░░ Justice Department told lawyers ░░░░░░░░ Judicial Watch a think ░░░░░░░░ that sues the government ░░░░░░░░ transparency that they found ░░░░░░░░ or so documents relating ░░░░░░░░ this event SHAWN And ░░░░░░░░ don t know what ░░░░░░░░ documents are NAPOLITANO Correct ░░░░░░░░ don t know what ░░░░░░░░ show or who instigated ░░░░░░░░ meeting We don t ░░░░░░░░ what they stated purpose ░░░░░░░░ the meeting was It ░░░░░░░░ reinforce what Bill Clinton ░░░░░░░░ Loretta Lynch said they ░░░░░░░░ about their grandchildren I ░░░░░░░░ doing air quotes because ░░░░░░░░ sounds absurd they would ░░░░░░░░ to these lengths just ░░░░░░░░ talk about their grandchildren ░░░░░░░░ if they really and ░░░░░░░░ did talk about whether ░░░░░░░░ not the DoJ was ░░░░░░░░ to seek Mrs Clinton ░░░░░░░░ indictment SHAWN It went ░░░░░░░░ for 40 minutes or ░░░░░░░░ Hillary Clinton said there ░░░░░░░░ nothing inappropriate was said ░░░░░░░░ any way Both of ░░░░░░░░ meaning her husband and ░░░░░░░░ lynch came to regret ░░░░░░░░ pleasantries that day NAPOLITANO ░░░░░░░░ is also the stated ░░░░░░░░ for Jim Comey s ░░░░░░░░ rogue That is taking ░░░░░░░░ ball away from his ░░░░░░░░ in the Justice Department ░░░░░░░░ deciding on his own ░░░░░░░░ or not I say ░░░░░░░░ purpose We don t ░░░░░░░░ the real purpose Deciding ░░░░░░░░ his own whether or ░░░░░░░░ to present evidence to ░░░░░░░░ grand jury seeking Clinton ░░░░░░░░ indictment There is more ░░░░░░░░ enough evidence to sought ░░░░░░░░ indictment But between the ░░░░░░░░ meeting and the decision ░░░░░░░░ Jim Comey she wasn ░░░░░░░░ indicted She could still ░░░░░░░░ indicted The statute of ░░░░░░░░ is five years seven ░░░░░░░░ It s plenty of ░░░░░░░░ SHAWN Judicial Watch says ░░░░░░░░ F B I In ░░░░░░░░ view is quote out ░░░░░░░░ control Here is their ░░░░░░░░ The F B I ░░░░░░░░ out of control stunning ░░░░░░░░ F B I Found ░░░░░░░░ records only after we ░░░░░░░░ the agency hiding them ░░░░░░░░ another lawsuit We ll ░░░░░░░░ to press for answers ░░░░░░░░ the F B I ░░░░░░░░ gains in court In ░░░░░░░░ meantime the F B ░░░░░░░░ Should stop the stone ░░░░░░░░ and release these new ░░░░░░░░ immediately There is significant ░░░░░░░░ about whether the F ░░░░░░░░ I And Obama justice ░░░░░░░░ investigation gave Clinton and ░░░░░░░░ witnesses a potential targets ░░░░░░░░ rention treatments NAPOLITANO The ░░░░░░░░ in Washington let s ░░░░░░░░ our predecessors in the ░░░░░░░░ that our successors will ░░░░░░░░ us That s not ░░░░░░░░ job Their job is ░░░░░░░░ find and reveal documents ░░░░░░░░ are sought unless there ░░░░░░░░ some legitimate privilege claimed ░░░░░░░░ which case the judge ░░░░░░░░ they stay secret SHAWN ░░░░░░░░ we get an indication ░░░░░░░░ the nature of these ░░░░░░░░ whether or not they ░░░░░░░░ sensitive and the F ░░░░░░░░ I Was trying to ░░░░░░░░ something or if they ░░░░░░░░ regular NAPOLITANO The F ░░░░░░░░ I Revealed the existence ░░░░░░░░ 30 of them If ░░░░░░░░ turn over 25 they ░░░░░░░░ to say what they ░░░░░░░░ with the other five ░░░░░░░░ they didn t turn ░░░░░░░░ over and a judge ░░░░░░░░ to review them Eric ░░░░░░░░ right I imagine with ░░░░░░░░ judge reviewing them it ░░░░░░░░ give neutral observer It ░░░░░░░░ a neutral person deciding ░░░░░░░░ or not there is ░░░░░░░░ reason in the statute ░░░░░░░░ the law for not ░░░░░░░░ them over Again it ░░░░░░░░ depend on what judge ░░░░░░░░ is Eric This judge ░░░░░░░░ be reading them Judge ░░░░░░░░ thank you so much ░░░░░░░░